Citation desk
Who stood with them
Public letters and newsroom records only. This page will not invent a famous signatory. If a name is not on an original URL, it is not here.
Accusations timeline · Journalist pack
Press freedom
International Press Institute and 10 partners
Joint letter: end the official campaign, protect Abraham, Szor, and their families from vigilante violence, keep army scrutiny legal.
IPI →Press freedom
Committee to Protect Journalists
CPJ and partners call on Israel to protect the filmmakers’ fundamental rights. Treat as a rights letter, not a review.
CPJ →Newsroom
+972 Magazine
Abraham’s newsroom condemned escalating threats against the directors. The investigations the film builds on were published here with Local Call and the Guardian.
+972 Magazine →Newsroom
שיחה מקומית / Local Call
Hebrew-language partner desk. The investigations sit where the smear is loudest. Cite the Hebrew originals, not a translation of a minister.
Local Call →Newsroom
The Guardian (producer and threats desk)
Produced the film with JW Films, published the directors’ interview, the Venice speech, and the 16 September threats report. That is the English primary file.
The Guardian →Filmmakers
1,000+ filmmakers (solidarity letter, via Ynet)
Ynet reports more than a thousand filmmakers asking that NAZA be shown and warning the vilification is nearing sanctioned violence. Cite the report. Do not paste a celebrity list this desk cannot verify.
Ynetnews →Newsroom
Haaretz (street record)
Haaretz is the Hebrew/English paper that put the house protests in print (“expel the traitors,” a second night). That reporting is a defense of the factual record even when the newsroom is not writing an op-ed of support.
Haaretz →
Embed
<iframe src="https://nazafilm.org/embed/defenders" title="Who has publicly defended the NAZA filmmakers" width="100%" height="720" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade" style="border:1px solid #3a342c;background:#12100e"></iframe>