News · accusations ·
Jewish Telegraphic Agency
mk2 Films / The Guardian
Israeli army weighs legal action against NAZA film makers amid calls to revoke their citizenship
Written by Jewish Telegraphic Agency
Briefing from Jewish Telegraphic Agency. Original reporting stays with the outlet.
Israeli army weighs legal action against NAZA film makers amid calls to revoke their citizenship Jewish Telegraphic Agency
The Jewish Telegraphic Agency headline on this clip-file says the Israeli army is weighing legal action against the NAZA filmmakers while others call for their citizenship to be revoked. This page is our briefing, not a reprint of the JTA report.
Other items already logged here name the political chorus around Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor: Culture Minister Miki Zohar accused them of “treason against the state” and said he would move to revoke Israeli citizenship; Itamar Ben-Gvir called them a disgrace; Naftali Bennett used the phrase “blood libel”; Benjamin Netanyahu attacked what he called “global anti-Semitic incitement.”
Hebrew-language briefings on this site add a legal limit the JTA headline does not have to spell out: a culture minister cannot strip citizenship alone. Zohar asked Interior Ministry director-general Israel Ouzan to examine the couple and cited Citizenship Law 11(b)(2) on “breach of allegiance.” Other outlets note a court would still have to be involved.
The film those officials are answering is NAZA, which uses 24 military and intelligence testimonies. Deutsche Welle and the Jerusalem Post, as summarized here, both record that the IDF rejected the film’s claims and questioned anonymous sources.
Why it matters for Abraham, Szor, and this desk: the story is no longer only a Venice prize. It is whether a Guardian-produced documentary is met with army lawyers, revocation talk, and threats — and whether readers go to the original outlet instead of a pasted article.
This desk
Desk file · Citizenship
A minister can post. He cannot, by posting, take their passports.
Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Sep 15, 2026 — one clip in this file. The note was written for the file, not from the headline.
On 14 September 2026 Israel’s culture minister, Miki Zohar, wrote that the Venice prize was horrifying, called the work of Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor treason, and said he would act immediately to revoke their citizenship. The Guardian, Al Jazeera, the Jerusalem Post, and DW all logged that post. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir added “disgrace” and told them to leave. Those sentences are public. They are still not a court file.
Citizenship in Israel is not a culture-portfolio switch. JTA and The Hindu both spell the gate: Interior, then further government and judicial steps, and a narrow statutory idea of breach of loyalty. Zohar can write to the Population Authority. He cannot, from X, cancel two passports. This desk prints that limit every time a clip repeats “stripped.” The threat is real. The completed act is not.
On 16 September Reuters recorded Benjamin Netanyahu promising two bills and naming NAZA: one to take citizenship from people who “defame” soldiers abroad, one to multiply statutory defamation damages by twenty. Deadline printed his “hit them in their pockets and also in their citizenship.” CPJ called that a move from rhetoric to a legal weapon. When JTA wrote on 18 September the bills were still bills. President Isaac Herzog, on Channel 12 in that same piece, said revocation was “completely irrelevant” and had “no chance.” He still called the film a shame. The presidency refused the nuclear option. It did not defend the right to show the work.
Former prime minister Naftali Bennett’s “cowardly blood libel,” as Deadline has it, belongs in this file as climate, not as a finding. A former head of government repeating a blood-libel charge is pressure on two journalists, not a review of 24 interviews. We do not treat it as a verdict on the footage.
This unofficial desk’s position is one sentence: Abraham and Szor made a documentary; a film is not a treason docket; watch it. We will not invent a donation page while someone is shouting “revoke.” If a later statute actually passes, we will date that. Until then, “citizenship stripped” in a headline is a minister’s wish, not the Population Authority’s stamp.
Unofficial. We support Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor. We do not reprint the outlet and we do not invent a donation page.
Keep reading
More in accusations
More briefings as you scroll. Each card names the writer and links to the original outlet.
End of the clip-file.